The Good News:July/August 2007Both God and the Bible have long been under attack. What are some of the motives of critics?And,far more important,what does the evidence dug from the dust of the Middle East reveal?
More evidence fr"The Bible and Archaeology"
Though not an abundance of specific archaeological evidence to confirm each event in the biblical account,a fairly good body of evidence confirming the Bible's overall account of the Exodus of the Hebrews out of Egypt, some of which will now be described.
Islamic apologists routinely argue that the New Testament text was significantly corrupted... To have, in Albania, a pre-Islamic manuscript that gives the lie to this claim is greatly encouraging to the local Christians as they try to proclaim truth.
The historical and archeological evidence for Biblical accuracy
"There can be no doubt that archaeology has confirmed the substantial historicity of Old Testament tradition."William F. Albright(1891–1971),one of the world's most respected archaeologists.
The Bible is a collection of many kinds of documents written over a period of about 1,500 years. Beginning with the composition of the first five books (the Pentateuch) by Moses, the 66 total documents were completed by the end of the first century A.D. ..
How do you respond to someone’s claim that the Bible is not inspired? Is there a way to prove inspiration or intelligently present evidence for its inspiration?The answer is,“Yes!” One of the best ways to prove inspiration is by examining prophecies.